He only starts comparing height to face around 9:20, and makes a false equivalence in favor of face: that the best face is better than the best height. That's obvious, like 0.1% of the population might have a 10/10 height, but only 0.000001% of the population has a 10/10 face, so of course face is better. He even makes this counter argument himself at 10:20
Then he further argues face over height, because you're more likely to be a famous actor or model, which is straight up irrelevant to dating. If he wants to talk about face vs height outside of dating, he should be talking about career and how other men respect your face vs height, not your ability to be a model if you're in the top 0.1% in face.
Besides those 2 points, it's a good video. He should have also mentioned the value threshold at 10:20 (horizontal line on the graph where below that, most women will reject you), how a larger proportion of men won't meet women's standards due to height than due to face, based on the curvature of the graphs.