This is a women's world, that's why if men disappeared society would collapse. If women completely disappeared, society would not really suffer at all in terms of its infrastructure. In terms of functionality, society depends entirely on men. Women are worthless and you should be thankful you're not enslaved, because society's functionality has 0% reliance on women.
We women know how to build things too.
Doesn't matter that you had women rulers. The point is anything they did could have been done by a man and better. There's nothing in terms of the functioning of society that women are required for, yet there's a lot men are required for. You couldn't name one thing women are necessary for in terms of keeping society functional (besides reproduction, which is not something relating to the infrastructure of society per se).
Most healthcare workers and teachers are women. so women do contribute a lot to society whether you like it or not.
www.apa.org
I would have been able to if i women actually got more opportunities but like you said this is a moids world .
Yeah I agree.
That does not mean they are necessary. That means there's many of them. Women's role in healthcare is not that important. Doctors and surgeons are overwhelmingly men. Women are mainly nurses and caretakers, which are frankly disposable when it comes to the functioning of society. As for teachers, that is the most overrated and unnecessary profession in existence. Every school could be burned down to the ground and society would work equally as well. But even if we wanted to keep schools, the fact that there are more women teaching children (as opposed to college professors, which are mostly male because their discipline is actually relevant) just proves that women like children more, not that they are better at teaching. Not that anything children learn in primary school is useful in the first place. Women do not play any vital role by being primary school teachers. On account that this wasn't the rule until the 20th century and somehow society worked just fine for all of history until then.
There's not one thing women have ever done better than men as far as contributing to the social structure. You're absurdly delusional if you think a CEO goes, "Women are better than men at doing this job, so I should hire them if I want to increase my profits. However, I won't hire women because that would be giving them power and I am so misogynistic I'd rather lose money than hire women to increase my company's profit." Is that how it works? Could it be perhaps that women aren't hired for important positions because they're not as good at them? And you don't get the excuse of "we're so good but they won't let us try", because in the first world, women can do whatever they want and they still don't excel at the level men do. So it ain't because they don't have the opportunity to succeed.
Well most of my doctors are females . Just today I went to the optahmologist and my doctor was a female.
www.pewresearch.org
That's because you're a child. Paediatricians are more likely to be female. Also, I've read that article. The difference in percentages is too small to be statistically relevant. You could find any study saying the opposite. Not to mention that this doesn't account for what kind of patients are treated by female surgeons vs. male surgeons.
"Oh look this study says". The fuck is that supposed to mean? That is self-reported discrimination. There's no actual proof of discrimination there. I can also claim I'm being discriminated if I want to, but that doesn't mean I am. That "study" is based entirely on one's own bias in assessing whether or not they've been discriminated against. It says "percentage of employed adults saying they have experienced each of these things at work because of their gender". There is one problem with that: how the fuck do they know that it is because of their gender that they experienced such things? Like "being denied a promotion". What's that supposed to mean? Like she went to the boss and the boss told her "no because you're a woman"? Of course not. That's just something she's making up as a reason for why she didn't get promoted. I can also claim I wasn't promoted due to prejudice if I want to; that's not proof that it did actually happen.Well seems like women in the first world do get discriminated thoughGender discrimination comes in many forms for today’s working women
About four-in-ten working U.S. women say they have faced discrimination on the job because of their gender. They report a broad array of personal experiences.
Study finds: Women are better at being submissive and servient than men, shocking!Girls make higher grades than boys in all school subjects, analysis finds
Despite the stereotype that boys do better in math and science, girls have made higher grades than boys throughout their school years for nearly a century.
yup, talking to people who have made it pretty far career or financially wise is good, i've had such opportunities before, it was eye opening, one taught me simply asking is important, you never know who's gonna say yes
So you do agree pediatricians ( doctors) are most likely to be females.
You are coping right now.
Alright, I have nothign to say in this.
Stfu faggot
Make me a curry sandwich
Uhhh... no? Saying paediatricians are most likely to be females does not counter the claim that females in healthcare are predominantly nurses and that doctors are predominantly male. Paediatrician is one kind of doctor. That's like if you say females are more likely to be teachers and then I say math teachers are mostly male. Okay, but even if that was true that doesn't cancel the fact that teachers as a whole is a feminine profession. Medicine, as a whole, is a masculine discipline.
Coping my ass, it's called margin of error. When you do a poll about something and the difference is by a few percentage points, then that difference is not significant, particularly when it's a single poll. That could very well be statistical noise. And as for the other thing, obviously it is very important to distinguish what kind of patients are women treating, because the study doesn't account for that. Just refers to surgeons in general, but not all kinds of surgeons are the same.
Ask your mom to make one
No I want your smelly curry troon hands to make it
No it’s not
holy cope
Sorry bhai
Yeah you can keep naming branches of medicine women are a majority of, but that doesn't change the fact that medicine as a whole is dominated by males. I can name The Sims and Roblox and Candy Crush as games women play, but that doesn't change that video games are mostly played by men.
Holy retarded woman. Read what I fucking said and explain what's wrong with it. You can't refute anything I said in that comment so you resort to a braindead two-word answer.
