• Email lookstheory@mail.com to appeal your ban or get your account back from deletion or a voluntary break. Even if you hate my guts, let's work something out.
  • Notice: If you're going to do nothing but talk shit about the forum and call it a "shithole," or be some asshole PSL/Lookism narc, then either leave or don't even bother joining. That behavior won't be tolerated.

Kill all North African women larping as white

That page is protected by the admins

Idgaf about that lil nigga
The fuck does it have to do that it's "protected by the admins"? The whole point is the admins are biased. Otherwise, Wikipedia wouldn't be accused of having any sort of bias to begin with.
 
Idgaf about that lil nigga
Of course you don't, you just post whatever your 10 second google search gives you to validate your retarded ideas.
 
What propaganda bitch? I didn't make up any of that. Don't blame me. Ain't "my propaganda". But if it is, then show me stats that say the opposite. You'd think if it's false propaganda they'd be actual reports by honest scientists saying the opposite, but somehow every single report says the same thing. How can that be? Are all scientists racist? There must be some that aren't and tell the truth, so show them to me.

That's why India is such a great developed country, equal or better than most countries made by white people. Oh, wait.
Even if it was 10 million, less than 1% of a population with an average IQ of 80 being intellectually gifted doesn't disprove the country's AVERAGE IQ.
idgaf, my state has 100 percent literacy.
 
The fuck does it have to do that it's "protected by the admins"? The whole point is the admins are biased. Otherwise, Wikipedia wouldn't be accused of having any sort of bias to begin with.
The admins are "biased" now 💀 doing WAY too much on an incel forum


Focus on looksmaxxing lil nigs
 
Wikipedia is unreliable now? That page is protected by the admins to prevent vandalism
Wikipedia is unreliable for anything that isn't factual and indisputable. When there's any component of ideology, why would it be any more objective? Wikipedia is a bunch of random guys who edit articles. If something is not factual, why is some random Wikipedia editor more qualified than I am to state what is correct or not?
 
That page is protected by the admins
>"wikipedia admins and editors are biased"
>"but the page is protected by wikipedia admins!"

You're really not making a good case for your country's intelligence buddy boyo
:cage:
 
>"wikipedia admins and editors are biased"
>"but the page is protected by wikipedia admins!"

You're really not making a good case for your country's intelligence buddy boyo
:cage:
I never said they were biased, YOU were the one who said so
 
The admins are "biased" now 💀 doing WAY too much on an incel forum


Focus on looksmaxxing lil nigs
Read the Wikipedia article on Donald Trump and then tell me Wikipedia is impartial. If you read Trump's article and then Hitler's, you'll realize Hitler's article uses more neutral and unbiased language than Trump's. And that's just an example.
 
idgaf, my state has 100 percent literacy.
I had 100% literacy at 6 years old, what's your point? Congratulations, people in your specific province achieved the bare minimum.
 
Once again, that page is protected
Protected by a bunch of guys who write articles. Again, who tf you think are the Wikipedia admins? You think they're some extraterrestrial master race? They're a bunch of guys who write articles lol. What are their qualifications to write articles?
 
Protected by a bunch of guys who write articles. Again, who tf you think are the Wikipedia admins? You think they're some extraterrestrial master race? They're a bunch of guys who write articles lol. What are their qualifications to write articles?
They literally link evidence to their claims JFL
 
You know it's bad when all you cope about is your "IQ"


Hope y'all get a reality check soon (if y'all haven't already)
 
They literally link evidence to their claims JFL
Yeah so did I, but that's pseudoscience to you. Any can link evidence to their claims. But no, their sources are all correct and indisputable as the Bible. Mine are misinformation. Again, what qualifies them to write categorical articles more than I or anybody else?
 
Back
Top Bottom